Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2010 7:07:20 GMT -5
"Dark Is The Night" Starring Winona Ryder, John Cusack, Ewan McGregor, Rachael McAdams, and Micky Roarke. Directed by Steven Spielberg. Its Los Angeles, 1939 - A curious private detective (Cusack) trails and uncovers an avenging plot by a former silent film actress/femme-fatale with a heart (Ryder), known to many as the The Black Butterfly. After a few close encounters the two strangers fall in love while trying to survive an underestimating clash with the Butterfly's target - a ruthless gangster (Roarke), representing the City of Angels for a certain worldwide secret society that has a surprising tie to the Nazi's and a future that is seemingly controlled by their evil.
Specific Catagory: Noir Drama/Romance/Action
---
"The Way Of The World" (Title Changed from The Way Of All Things) Starring Winona Ryder, Sean Penn, Katie Holmes with Anthony Hopkins and Tom Cruise. Directed by Frank Darabont (The Shawshank Redemption) In 1971, a homeland Vietnam War nurse (Ryder) must find her missing human rights activist father (Hopkins) in a lone rising conflict that leads her to Tibet. And a photojournalist (Penn) is sworn to protect her along the way as they find a misguided rogue American soldier (Cruise) trying to thwart them with a classified mission of his own.
Specific Catagory: War Drama/Adventure/Action
|
|
|
Post by imayne on Apr 29, 2010 12:39:02 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2010 20:03:19 GMT -5
I'm not afraid. Must I dutifully have to dread? I may not be your match. I'm just this catch, instead. Is there an eCLeCTiC film school fraternity pledge? Perhaps some old threads MAY need to be retread. But I am entertained with your bravado, Mr. Homestead
|
|
|
Post by ilovewinona on Apr 30, 2010 6:56:37 GMT -5
The poll doesn't have an option for me to vote for one of your choices. So I'll just say I'd vote for "The Way of All Things", that would be something of a faceoff to see. ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/smiley.png) ----- Rusty
|
|
|
Post by Charles on Apr 30, 2010 11:16:23 GMT -5
I'm not afraid. Must I dutifully have to dread? I may not be your match. I'm just this catch, instead. Is there an eCLeCTiC film school fraternity pledge? Perhaps some old threads MAY need to be reread. But I am entertained with your bravado, Mr. Homestead Great response . . . the bravado is full of sound and fury . . .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2010 14:08:10 GMT -5
Thanks, Charles. Also, as being the better option I think, one can still enjoy another's "bravado" while unneccessarily using any sound and fury. But as some will further contend staticly - Where's the fun in that!
|
|
|
Post by Charles on Apr 30, 2010 14:14:03 GMT -5
DL, I was referring to the quote from MacBeth, which in full is,"A tale . . . full of sound and fury; signifying nothing." ![;)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/wink.png) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2010 19:38:45 GMT -5
Hmm, I see. I think I may not fully understand you, Charles . . . because I didn't get that before. But here's something: Its always interesting when one quotes a line from one of Shakespeare's plays or poems - It may signify itself that what one may presume means something is actually nothing from what should have always been seen as simply nothing . . . and that, to me, is something I find to be so revealing. ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) ;D But sometimes, from out of the blue, some nothings can be such surprising somethings. And I do mean without any 'Shakespearing'.
|
|